<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is some of the best funds with a 10 to 15 year history?</title>
	<link>http://fundsblog.com/2006/10/26/mutual-funds-33/</link>
	<description>All About Mutual Funds</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: random_market_investor</title>
		<link>http://fundsblog.com/2006/10/26/mutual-funds-33/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>random_market_investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 09:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fundsblog.com/2006/10/26/mutual-funds-33/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Be careful when screening Funds based on just their 10-15 year history.

Assuming you are looking to "beat" the market and are looking for Actively managed funds. take the following cautions:

1) Look at 5, 10 , 15 years histories and for the Best ones look to see if any changes have occured recently - like has a new fund manager been appointed?

2) Be careful of funds that are too large - the larger the fund the more difficult it is to continually beat the market.

3) the returns ignore FEES - factor in the FEES - these can KILL your performance

4) the returns ignore the taxes - funds with high turnovers may have significant annual taxes - factors those in

Or just look at an Index fund - do not try to beat the market with funds and just attempt to match it. (BTW - select index funds with the lowest fees - since its not actively managed why pay more?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful when screening Funds based on just their 10-15 year history.</p>
<p>Assuming you are looking to &#8220;beat&#8221; the market and are looking for Actively managed funds. take the following cautions:</p>
<p>1) Look at 5, 10 , 15 years histories and for the Best ones look to see if any changes have occured recently - like has a new fund manager been appointed?</p>
<p>2) Be careful of funds that are too large - the larger the fund the more difficult it is to continually beat the market.</p>
<p>3) the returns ignore FEES - factor in the FEES - these can KILL your performance</p>
<p>4) the returns ignore the taxes - funds with high turnovers may have significant annual taxes - factors those in</p>
<p>Or just look at an Index fund - do not try to beat the market with funds and just attempt to match it. (BTW - select index funds with the lowest fees - since its not actively managed why pay more?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LongArm</title>
		<link>http://fundsblog.com/2006/10/26/mutual-funds-33/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>LongArm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 02:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fundsblog.com/2006/10/26/mutual-funds-33/#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Go to Morninstar.com and use their fund screener to screen for no-load funds that have outperformed their respective categories for 10 years.  But you need to know what KIND of funds you're looking for--THEN you can look for the best funds in those categories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go to Morninstar.com and use their fund screener to screen for no-load funds that have outperformed their respective categories for 10 years.  But you need to know what KIND of funds you&#8217;re looking for&#8211;THEN you can look for the best funds in those categories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://fundsblog.com/2006/10/26/mutual-funds-33/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 20:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fundsblog.com/2006/10/26/mutual-funds-33/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>I recommend calling an expert at Fidelity for some suggestions.  They are very knowledgeable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recommend calling an expert at Fidelity for some suggestions.  They are very knowledgeable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
